[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081030181051.GB11521@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:10:51 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@...glemail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Strange stop-signal behavior in multithreaded program with
defunct main
On 10/30, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 6:00 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> > On 10/28, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> >>
> >> Bert Wesarg described a scenario that I quickly replicated on
> >> 2.6.28-rc2 (and 2.6.25 -- it's not a regression in 2.6.28-rc)
> >> using the program below: if we have a multithreaded process
> >> with a defunct main thread running on a tty, and that
> >> process is sent a stop signal (either ^Z (SIGTSTP) or a stop
> >> signal sent from another terminal using kill(1)), then:
> >>
> >> a) the terminal is locked up; and
> >>
> >> b) the program is unresponsive to any other signal, except SIGKILL
> >> or SIGCONT.
> >
> > Yes, known problem. Please look at
> >
> > [RFC,PATCH 3/3] do_wait: fix waiting for stopped group with dead leader
> > http://marc.info/?t=119713920000003
>
> Okay -- thanks for the info. I've added some text to man-pages to
> cover this bug.
Well, we should fix this bug, of course.
I'll try to redo my old patch, but fyi I am very busy right now, and
most probably I will be completely offline during the next week.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists