[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081030195107.GK27407@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:51:07 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] x86: add non x86 build configuration
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> A lot of developers develop on x86 architectures, and do things that
> sometimes breaks non x86 archs. This patch adds a debug option to
> turn off all the CONFIG_HAVE_ options that x86 sets. This allows
> developers to easily test their code to make sure that it compiles
> without a lot of the assumptions that x86 makes.
>
> Note: Recently the ftrace code had an issue where a depend was set
> by the wrong select, but that select was not set by all archs.
> This patch catches that issue when compiling on x86.
cool, very nice - thanks Steve!
testing this way scales _far_ better than maintaining a farm of
cross-compilers.
One important detail: could you please flip around the modality of the
option? Right now it's CONFIG_SIMULATE_NON_X86_CONFIGURATION, and that
will be set by allyesconfig. But it has the exact opposite effect of
an "all yes" config.
So please name it something like CONFIG_STANDARD_X86_FEATURES, and
also make it depend on CONFIG_EMBEDDED (only allow it to be turned off
when EMBEDDED is enabled).
ok?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists