[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081030205712.GC24626@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:57:12 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] x86: add non x86 build configuration
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> >
> > * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> >
> > One important detail: could you please flip around the modality of the
> > option? Right now it's CONFIG_SIMULATE_NON_X86_CONFIGURATION, and that
> > will be set by allyesconfig. But it has the exact opposite effect of
> > an "all yes" config.
>
> Hmm, I made it a choice, with the "Normal Config" as default, so
> that allyesconfig will not set it. Does it get set for you when you
> do an allyesconfig? I had to do the following:
hm, indeed.
Still ... the Kconfig glue looks a bit weird - it's almost never a
good idea to put 'NOT' (or any other logic operator) into a config
name. Why not make this CONFIG_STANDARD_X86_FEATURES and allow it to
be disabled when CONFIG_EMBEDDED is enabled? This way it's not just a
debug thing but also a kernel sizing feature.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists