[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081030212753.GD30303@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:27:53 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: use CONFIG_X86_SMP instead of CONFIG_SMP
* James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
> >From 6e5fbb4691fd68f5b03608c5d8d96e4f189e623a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:11:48 -0500
> Subject: [VOYAGER] x86: use CONFIG_X86_SMP instead of CONFIG_SMP
>
> CONFIG_SMP is used for features which work on *all* x86 boxes.
> CONFIG_X86_SMP is used for standard PC like x86 boxes (for things
> like multi core and apics)
i've applied your fix to tip/x86/urgent, as it's obviously correct in
the current scheme of things, thanks!
but that needless build-time distinction should go away. We can now
support a whole host of 'weird' SMP boxes via genapic and x86_quirks.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists