[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <490A2A30.5040905@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:42:08 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: next-20081030: voyager compile busted
James Bottomley wrote:
>
> Before you advocate this, think what it would entail. Voyager replaces
> (and has to replace because its not apic based) the entirety of smp.c
> and smpboot.c ... they'd all have to be abstracted through function
> pointers.
>
... or through patched direct calls, which is of course also a possibility.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists