[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081030215455.GC6583@localdomain>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:54:56 -0700
From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tim@...lemp.com, shai@...lex86.org
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: Fix /dev/mem mmap breakage when PAT is disabled
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 02:29:49PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:21:21 -0700
>Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 01:21:03PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> >On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:02:03 -0700
>> >Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@...lex86.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >well... technically the aliases are bad without PAT as well...
>> >
>>
>> Hmm! Well, you mean if mtrr is used to change attributes?
>
>you can also set uncached in the pagetables, like via ioremap_uncached
>and other ways.
>
>and /dev/mem may or may not imply cached/uncached, depending on the
>open flags.
>
>On memory... what would that mean?
>
Well, I am not denying that an incorrectly written userspace program could cause
cache aliasing/crash the system I am not arguing for or against this
argument at all.
However, there is what seems like an unintended change in behavior from
2.6.25 to 2.6.26 when CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM is disabled and PAT is disabled,
which is a bug, and this patch fixes it that's all. If this was intentional,
then I don't see the reason for having CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM!!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists