[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081030231723.GB1985@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:17:23 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix missing cpu_index initialisation
* James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
> >From f49bbb826d8ec87609a63fb014af6aacb16aac38 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:13:09 -0500
> Subject: [VOYAGER] x86: fix missing cpu_index initialisation
>
> Ever since
>
> commit 92cb7612aee39642d109b8d935ad265e602c0563
> Author: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
> Date: Fri Oct 19 20:35:04 2007 +0200
>
> x86: convert cpuinfo_x86 array to a per_cpu array
>
> We've had an extra field in cpuinfo_x86 which is cpu_index.
> Unfortunately, voyager has never initialised this, although the only
> noticeable impact seems to be that /proc/cpuinfo shows all zeros for
> the processor ids.
>
> Anyway, fix this by initialising the boot CPU properly and setting the
> index when the secondaries update.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
> ---
>
> Depends on [VOYAGER] x86: add ability to test for boot CPU
applied both to tip/x86/urgent:
6b5496e: x86/voyager: fix missing cpu_index initialisation
3b25aec: x86/voyager: fix compile breakage caused by dc1e35c6e95e8923cf1d35104
thanks James,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists