lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081031071644.GD19268@wotan.suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:16:44 +0100
From:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>
Cc:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, aliguori@...emonkey.ws,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@...zta.fm>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regression: vmalloc easily fail.

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 09:28:54AM -0200, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 05:49:41AM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 08:07:37PM -0200, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:43:33AM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:29:40PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > > > Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > > > >Hmm, spanning <30MB of memory... how much vmalloc space do you have?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  
> > > > > 
> > > > > From the original report:
> > > > > 
> > > > > >VmallocTotal:     122880 kB
> > > > > >VmallocUsed:       15184 kB
> > > > > >VmallocChunk:      83764 kB
> > > > > 
> > > > > So it seems there's quite a bit of free space.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Chunk is the largest free contiguous region, right?  If so, it seems the 
> > > > 
> > > > Yes.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > problem is unrelated to guard pages, instead the search isn't finding a 
> > > > > 1-page area (with two guard pages) for some reason, even though lots of 
> > > > > free space is available.
> > > > 
> > > > Hmm. The free area search could be buggy...
> > > Do you want me to grab any specific info of it? Or should I just hack myself
> > > randomly into it? I'll probably have some time for that tomorrow.
> > 
> > I took a bit of a look. Does this help you at all?
> > 
> > I still think we should get rid of the guard pages in non-debug kernels
> > completely, but hopefully this will fix your problems?
> unfortunately, it doesn't.
> problem still happen in a kernel with this patch.

That's weird. Any chance you could dump a list of all the vmap area start
and end adresses and their flags before returning failure?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ