linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] B+Tree library

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0810311016160.22521@anakin>
Date:	Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:16:27 +0100 (CET)
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
cc:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] B+Tree library

On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Fri, 31 October 2008 07:38:46 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2008 schrieb Jörn Engel:
> > > Except that min/max in include/linux/kernel.h have some type-safety
> > > added.  In this particular case that is actually a disadvantage:
> > 
> > So what about min_t and max_t from include/linux/kernel.h? Can that be used?
> 
> Sorry, no.  The problems comes from using MAX in structure initializers.
> 
> struct btree_geo btree_geo32 = {
> 	.keylen = 1,
> 	.no_pairs = NODESIZE / sizeof(long) / 2,
> };

Where's the MIN/MAX? ;-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds