linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] hardirq.h clean up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081031093030.GC30317@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:30:30 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	srostedt@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hardirq.h clean up


* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> 
> This patch converts the CPP macros of __irq_enter, __irq_exit,
> nmi_enter, and nmi_exit into static inlines.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/hardirq.h |   53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

makes sense, but have you done build-testing (and cross-build-testing) 
of this? I remember that this area was include-file-dependencies-hell 
in the past.

perhaps with your simulate-old-arch patch on x86 we could tickle some 
of the issues that trigger here.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/