[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1225452697.8004.211.camel@pasglop>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 22:31:37 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.28-rc1: NVRAM being corrupted on ppc64 preventing boot
(bisected)
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 22:18 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Mel Gorman writes:
>
> > Yaboot in my case and I've heard it affected a DVD installation. I don't
> > know for sure if it affects netboot but as I think it's something the
> > kernel is doing, it probably doesn't matter how it gets loaded?
>
> I do need to know whether it was the vmlinux or the zImage.pseries
> that you were loading with yaboot. That commit you identified affects
> the contents of an ELF note in the zImage.pseries that firmware looks
> at, as well as a structure in the kernel itself that gets passed as an
> argument to a call to firmware. If you were loading a vmlinux with
> yaboot when you saw the corruption occur then that narrows things down
> a bit.
Unless missed something, I think it's narrowed already. When loaded from
yaboot, there is no relevant difference between zImage and vmlinux here.
IE. yaboot parses the ELF header of the zImage itself and ignores the
special notes anyway so only the CAS firmware call is relevant in both
cases, no ?
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists