[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081031130341.GA12018@sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:03:41 -0500
From: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH] small optimization to update_curr_rt
A very minor improvement, but might it be better to check sched_rt_runtime(rt_rq)
before taking the rt_runtime_lock?
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>
--
kernel/sched_rt.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux/kernel/sched_rt.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/sched_rt.c 2008-10-22 16:10:03.000000000 -0500
+++ linux/kernel/sched_rt.c 2008-10-31 07:57:19.000000000 -0500
@@ -537,13 +537,13 @@ static void update_curr_rt(struct rq *rq
for_each_sched_rt_entity(rt_se) {
rt_rq = rt_rq_of_se(rt_se);
- spin_lock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
if (sched_rt_runtime(rt_rq) != RUNTIME_INF) {
+ spin_lock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
rt_rq->rt_time += delta_exec;
if (sched_rt_runtime_exceeded(rt_rq))
resched_task(curr);
+ spin_unlock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
}
- spin_unlock(&rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock);
}
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists