[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa79d98a0810302315k760ce8e1q1eab3d0c2258baae@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:15:07 +0300
From: "Cyrill Gorcunov" <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix compile breakage caused by 2ae111cdd8d83ebf9de72e36e68a8c84b6ebbeea
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>>
>> * James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> wrote:
>>
>>> >From bd011c0cc51ce1fbab95403a570a8b47ad6ba500 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
>>> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:19:49 -0500
>>> Subject: [VOYAGER] x86: Fix subarch compile breakage
>>>
>>> commit 2ae111cdd8d83ebf9de72e36e68a8c84b6ebbeea
>>> Author: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
>>> Date: Mon Aug 11 18:34:08 2008 +0400
>>>
>>> x86: apic interrupts - move assignments to irqinit_32.c, v2
>>>
>>> Wrongly moved irq2 setup out of the mach-default/setup.c file. This
>>> causes a breakage on voyager which needs its own version. Fix by
>>> moving it back again.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/x86/kernel/irqinit_32.c | 12 ------------
>>> arch/x86/mach-default/setup.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit_32.c
>>> index 845aa98..3928784 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit_32.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irqinit_32.c
>>> @@ -81,15 +81,6 @@ void __init init_ISA_irqs (void)
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> -/*
>>> - * IRQ2 is cascade interrupt to second interrupt controller
>>> - */
>>> -static struct irqaction irq2 = {
>>> - .handler = no_action,
>>> - .mask = CPU_MASK_NONE,
>>> - .name = "cascade",
>>> -};
>>> -
>>> DEFINE_PER_CPU(vector_irq_t, vector_irq) = {
>>> [0 ... IRQ0_VECTOR - 1] = -1,
>>> [IRQ0_VECTOR] = 0,
>>> @@ -167,9 +158,6 @@ void __init native_init_IRQ(void)
>>> alloc_intr_gate(THERMAL_APIC_VECTOR, thermal_interrupt);
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> - if (!acpi_ioapic)
>>> - setup_irq(2, &irq2);
>>> -
>>> /* setup after call gates are initialised (usually add in
>>> * the architecture specific gates)
>>> */
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mach-default/setup.c b/arch/x86/mach-default/setup.c
>>> index 37b9ae4..53b4202 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/mach-default/setup.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/mach-default/setup.c
>>> @@ -38,6 +38,15 @@ void __init pre_intr_init_hook(void)
>>> init_ISA_irqs();
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * IRQ2 is cascade interrupt to second interrupt controller
>>> + */
>>> +static struct irqaction irq2 = {
>>> + .handler = no_action,
>>> + .mask = CPU_MASK_NONE,
>>> + .name = "cascade",
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> /**
>>> * intr_init_hook - post gate setup interrupt initialisation
>>> *
>>> @@ -53,6 +62,9 @@ void __init intr_init_hook(void)
>>> if (x86_quirks->arch_intr_init())
>>> return;
>>> }
>>> + if (!acpi_ioapic)
>>> + setup_irq(2, &irq2);
>>> +
>>> }
>>
>> hm, this change looks backwards (doubly so ;-).
>>
>> Is the build problem caused by the lack of the acpi_ioapic flag on
>> Voyager?
>>
>> Ingo
>>
>
> Thanks for report, cant get access to sources right now -- will check it later.
>
Btw James, what the build bug message was? Could you post it please?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists