[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081101194357.1810f57a@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 19:43:57 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: (BUG?) round_jiffies() is non-monotonic on SMP
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 22:36:30 -0400 (EDT)
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > > Come to think of it, is there any good reason why
> > > round_jiffies() doesn't always round up? It seems a lot safer.
> >
> > at the time folks had concerns about making a big error in that
> > direction...
>
> All right then. Would it be preferable to add a new
> round_jiffies_up() routine, or to change round_jiffies() so that it
> never rounds down?
I'd prefer the former.
But to be honest.. I would even more prefer the use of range timers ;)
They're in 2.6.28-rc now ... and more power friendly than rounded timers
(although I will readily admit that rounding is just easier)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists