[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1225719328.3575.9.camel@dv>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 08:35:28 -0500
From: Pavel Roskin <proski@....org>
To: Bob Copeland <me@...copeland.com>
Cc: linville@...driver.com, mickflemm@...il.com, jirislaby@...il.com,
lrodriguez@...eros.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
ath5k-devel@...ts.ath5k.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
michael+ath5k@...pelberg.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath5k: fix detection of jumbo frames
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 14:08 -0500, Bob Copeland wrote:
> Set ath5k_rs_status.rs_more using mask + shift. rs_more is a
> u8, but we were setting it with a bitwise AND of a 16 bit value.
> As a consequence, jumbo frames would not be discarded as intended.
> Then, because the hw rate value of such frames is zero, and, since
> 63266a653589e1a237527479f10212ea77ce7844 "ath5k: rates cleanup",
> we do not fall back to the basic rate, such packets would trigger
> the following WARN_ON:
Thanks for catching it! Please mention rs_antenna in addition to
rs_more.
> - rs->rs_antenna = rx_status->rx_status_0 &
> - AR5K_5210_RX_DESC_STATUS0_RECEIVE_ANTENNA;
> - rs->rs_more = rx_status->rx_status_0 &
> - AR5K_5210_RX_DESC_STATUS0_MORE;
> + rs->rs_antenna = AR5K_REG_MS(rx_status->rx_status_0,
> + AR5K_5210_RX_DESC_STATUS0_RECEIVE_ANTENNA);
> + rs->rs_more = AR5K_REG_MS(rx_status->rx_status_0,
> + AR5K_5210_RX_DESC_STATUS0_MORE);
rs_more should be boolean. It would be better to use "!!" to calculate
rs_rate. No need to shift anything. As for rs_antenna, it's fine with
me.
> +#define AR5K_5212_RX_DESC_STATUS0_DECOMP_CRC_ERROR_S 13
This doesn't belong to the patch. It looks like it's another boolean
value, but it's not currently used.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists