linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] improve jbd fsync batching

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20081103125509.41e55529.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:55:09 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Josef Bacik <jbacik@...hat.com>
Cc:	jbacik@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	rwheeler@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] improve jbd fsync batching

On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 15:24:43 -0500
Josef Bacik <jbacik@...hat.com> wrote:

> > please fix.
> 
> I see you already pulled this into -mm, would you like me to repost with the
> same changelog and the patch updated, or just reply to this with the updated
> patch?  Thanks,

Either works for me at this stage.  If it's a replacement then I'll turn
it into an incremental so I can see what changed, which takes me about 2.15
seconds.

If it had been a large patch or if it had been under test in someone's
tree for a while then a replacement patch would be unwelcome.  But for a
small, fresh patch like this one it's no big deal either way.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/