[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081103132735.9e63a3d0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 13:27:35 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: ajones@...erbed.com, sandeen@...hat.com,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, sct@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext3: wait on all pending commits in ext3_sync_fs
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 16:19:29 -0500
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 01:13:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:58:54 -0800
> > Arthur Jones <ajones@...erbed.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Andrew, ...
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 12:37:50PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > OK. But still, questions remain.
> > > >
> > > > - should we clear s_dirt if log_wait_commit() didn't work?
> > > >
> > > > - ext3_force_commit() clears s_dirt also
> > > >
> > > > - should ext3_sync_fs() be dropping the ext3_force_commit() return
> > > > value on the floor?
>
> Should all the callers of ->sync_fs also be dropping the error returns
> on the floor?
Oh, this is sync_fs. How meaningful would it be to return an error
from sys_umount()? Would there be any point in leaving the errored fs
mounted? Dunno.
But if we're going to drop this error on the floor, we should do
that at a higher level, not on a per-fs basis ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists