linux-kernel - Re: patch: support long (above 14 bytes) HW addresses in arp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <adaod0wv021.fsf@cisco.com>
Date:	Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:53:26 -0800
From:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To:	Constantine Gavrilov <constantine.gavrilov@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: patch: support long (above 14 bytes) HW addresses in arp_ioctl

[netdev added to cc list]

 > In arp_req_get() in net/arp.c, there is code:
 > 
 > memcpy(r->arp_ha.sa_data, neigh->ha, dev->addr_len);
 > 
 > dev->addr_len can be larger than size of
 > r->arp_ha.sa_data. Inititally, I thought it would corrupt kernel
 > stack. I was wrong, since r still has enough space not to overflow
 > even for the largest HW address (32 bytes). It would corrupt the data
 > structure though, and that corrupted reply would be propagated to
 > user.
 > 
 > There is a similar situation in arp_req_set(), where a "junk" arp
 > entry will be set if dev->addr_len is larger that 14 bytes. 
 > 
 > At the very minimum, both arp_req_set() and arp_req_get() should
 > return error (-EINVAL), and not return junk or set junk. Truncated
 > /proc/net/arp output should also be fixed.

The EINVAL return makes sense; I'm not sure /proc/net/arp is important
enough to fix.  I guess it depends on the impact of the fix.

 > I was not aware that rtnetlink is capable of doing things like arp
 > table or interface manipulation (like netdevice ioctls). My
 > applications needs to be able to manipulate arp cache for large macs,
 > and I do not mind recompiling by adding a flag. I do not mind fixing
 > arp cli to use this either (venerable arp  does use arp_ioctl). And
 > there are many many legacy solutions that use arp_ioctl() in programs
 > and arp utility in scripts. Consider porting those to infiniband.
 > 
 > Will rtnetlink work for any net_device (like netdevice ioctls do) for
 > ARP and interface configurations calls or does it require special
 > support in net_device itself? Any possible problems with rtnetlink?

rtnetlink is the preferred modern interface between userspace and kernel
for networking information.  There is also the "iproute2" package that
provides a good command line interface that is capable of handling IPoIB
addresses.  For example:

$ ip addr show dev ib1
5: ib1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 2044 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP qlen 256
    link/infiniband 80:00:00:48:fe:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:02:c9:03:00:00:01:65 brd 00:ff:ff:ff:ff:12:40:1b:ff:ff:00:00:00:00:00:00:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.145.74/24 brd 192.168.145.255 scope global ib1
    inet6 fe80::202:c903:0:165/64 scope link 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

$ ip neigh
192.168.145.73 dev ib1 lladdr 80:00:00:48:fe:80:00:00:00:00:00:00:00:02:c9:03:00:00:01:30 STALE
172.29.224.1 dev eth0 lladdr 00:00:0c:07:ac:e0 REACHABLE

and so on.

 - R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/