[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081104182155.f1b6cdbb.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 18:21:55 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [patch 1/2] memcg: hierarchy, yet another one.
This patch is a toy for showing idea,
how do you think ?
[1/2] ... res counter part
[2/2] ... for memcg (mem+swap controller)
based on mem+swap controller + synchronized lru + some fixes(not posted)
I'm just wondering how to support hirerachy and not indend to improve this now.
[1/2] ... hierachical res_counter
==
Hierarchy support for res_coutner.
This patch adds following interface to res_counter.
- res_counter_init_hierarchy().
- res_counter_charge_hierarchy().
- res_counter_uncharge_hierarchy().
- res_counter_check_under_limit_hierarchy().
By this, if res_counter is properly intialized, a charge to res_counter
will be charged up to the root of res_counter.
root res_counter has is res_counter->parent pointer to be NULL.
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
---
include/linux/res_counter.h | 13 ++++++++
kernel/res_counter.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: mmotm-2.6.28-rc2+/include/linux/res_counter.h
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.28-rc2+.orig/include/linux/res_counter.h
+++ mmotm-2.6.28-rc2+/include/linux/res_counter.h
@@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ struct res_counter {
*/
unsigned long long failcnt;
/*
+ * The parent sharing resource.
+ */
+ struct res_counter *parent;
+ /*
* the lock to protect all of the above.
* the routines below consider this to be IRQ-safe
*/
@@ -88,6 +92,8 @@ enum {
*/
void res_counter_init(struct res_counter *counter);
+void res_counter_init_hierarchy(struct res_counter *counter,
+ struct res_counter *parent);
/*
* charge - try to consume more resource.
@@ -105,6 +111,8 @@ int __must_check res_counter_charge_lock
int __must_check res_counter_charge(struct res_counter *counter,
unsigned long val);
+int __must_check res_counter_charge_hierarchy(struct res_counter *counter,
+ unsigned long val, struct res_counter **fail);
/*
* uncharge - tell that some portion of the resource is released
*
@@ -118,6 +126,9 @@ int __must_check res_counter_charge(stru
void res_counter_uncharge_locked(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val);
void res_counter_uncharge(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val);
+void res_counter_uncharge_hierarchy(struct res_counter *counter,
+ unsigned long val);
+
static inline bool res_counter_limit_check_locked(struct res_counter *cnt)
{
if (cnt->usage < cnt->limit)
@@ -126,6 +137,8 @@ static inline bool res_counter_limit_che
return false;
}
+bool res_counter_check_under_limit_hierarchy(struct res_counter *cnt,
+ struct res_counter **fail);
/*
* Helper function to detect if the cgroup is within it's limit or
* not. It's currently called from cgroup_rss_prepare()
Index: mmotm-2.6.28-rc2+/kernel/res_counter.c
===================================================================
--- mmotm-2.6.28-rc2+.orig/kernel/res_counter.c
+++ mmotm-2.6.28-rc2+/kernel/res_counter.c
@@ -15,10 +15,17 @@
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
-void res_counter_init(struct res_counter *counter)
+void res_counter_init_hierarchy(struct res_counter *counter,
+ struct res_counter *parent)
{
spin_lock_init(&counter->lock);
counter->limit = (unsigned long long)LLONG_MAX;
+ counter->parent = parent;
+}
+
+void res_counter_init(struct res_counter *counter)
+{
+ res_counter_init_hierarchy(counter, NULL);
}
int res_counter_charge_locked(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val)
@@ -45,6 +52,7 @@ int res_counter_charge(struct res_counte
return ret;
}
+
void res_counter_uncharge_locked(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val)
{
if (WARN_ON(counter->usage < val))
@@ -62,6 +70,61 @@ void res_counter_uncharge(struct res_cou
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&counter->lock, flags);
}
+/**
+ * res_counter_charge_hierarchy - hierarchical resource charging.
+ * @counter: an res_counter to be charged.
+ * @val: value to be charged.
+ * @fail: a pointer to *res_counter for returning where we failed.
+ *
+ * charge "val" to res_counter and all ancestors of it. If fails, a pointer
+ * to res_counter which failed to be charged is returned to "fail".
+ */
+int res_counter_charge_hierarchy(struct res_counter *counter,
+ unsigned long val,
+ struct res_counter **fail)
+{
+ struct res_counter *tmp, *undo;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ for (tmp = counter; tmp != NULL; tmp = tmp->parent) {
+ ret = res_counter_charge(tmp, val);
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+ }
+ if (!ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ *fail = tmp;
+ for (undo = tmp, tmp = counter; tmp != undo; tmp = tmp->parent)
+ res_counter_uncharge(tmp, val);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+
+void res_counter_uncharge_hierarchy(struct res_counter *counter,
+ unsigned long val)
+{
+ struct res_counter *tmp;
+
+ for (tmp = counter; tmp != NULL; tmp = tmp->parent)
+ res_counter_uncharge(tmp, val);
+}
+
+bool res_counter_check_under_limit_hierarchy(struct res_counter *counter,
+ struct res_counter **fail)
+{
+ struct res_counter *tmp;
+ for (tmp = counter; tmp != NULL; tmp = tmp->parent)
+ if (!res_counter_check_under_limit(tmp))
+ break;
+
+ if (!tmp)
+ return true;
+ *fail = tmp;
+ return false;
+}
+
static inline unsigned long long *
res_counter_member(struct res_counter *counter, int member)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists