[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1225771353.6755.16.camel@nigel-laptop>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:02:33 +1100
From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Matt Tolentino <matthew.e.tolentino@...el.com>,
linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org, Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, pavel@...e.cz,
Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] hibernation should work ok with memory
hotplug
Hi.
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 14:34 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> A node might have a node_start_pfn=0 and a node_end_pfn=100 (and it may
> have only one zone). But, there may be another node with
> node_start_pfn=10 and a node_end_pfn=20. This loop:
>
> for_each_zone(zone) {
> ...
> for (pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn; pfn < max_zone_pfn; pfn++)
> if (page_is_saveable(zone, pfn))
> memory_bm_set_bit(orig_bm, pfn);
> }
>
> will walk over the smaller node's pfn range multiple times. Is this OK?
>
> I think all you have to do to fix it is check page_zone(page) == zone
> and skip out if they don't match.
So pfn 10 in the first node refers to the same memory as pfn 10 in the
second node?
Regards,
Nigel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists