linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/7] cpusets: add dirty map to struct address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20081104134256.24db6b36.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 4 Nov 2008 13:42:56 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	rientjes@...gle.com, npiggin@...e.de, peterz@...radead.org,
	menage@...gle.com, dfults@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/7] cpusets: add dirty map to struct address_space

On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 15:20:56 -0600 (CST)
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPUSETS
> >> +#if MAX_NUMNODES <= BITS_PER_LONG
> >> +	nodemask_t		dirty_nodes;	/* nodes with dirty pages */
> >> +#else
> >> +	nodemask_t		*dirty_nodes;	/* pointer to mask, if dirty */
> >> +#endif
> >> +#endif
> >>  } __attribute__((aligned(sizeof(long))));
> >
> > eek.  Increasing the size of the address_space (and hence of the inode)
> > is a moderately big deal - there can be millions of these in memory.
> 
> Well this is adding only a single word to the inode structure.

multiplied by millions.

> >> @@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ struct writeback_control {
> >>  	 * so we use a single control to update them
> >>  	 */
> >>  	unsigned no_nrwrite_index_update:1;
> >> +
> >> +	nodemask_t *nodes;		/* Nodemask to writeback */
> >
> > This one doesn't get ifdefs?
> 
> The structure is typically allocated temporarily on the stack.

An ifdef also helps catch the presence of unnecesary code.

> >> +	nodemask_t *nodes = mapping->dirty_nodes;
> >> +	int node = page_to_nid(page);
> >> +
> >> +	if (!nodes) {
> >> +		nodes = kmalloc(sizeof(nodemask_t), GFP_ATOMIC);
> >
> > erk, OK, called from __set_page_dirty, needs to be atomic.
> >
> > What are the consequences when this allocation fails?
> 
> Dirty tracking will not occur. All nodes are assumed to be dirty.

It won't oops?

> We discussed this earlier 
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0709.1/2291.html

Well, if it isn't in the changelog and isn't in code comments, we get
to discuss it again.

A great amount of mailing list discussion is a Huge Honking Big Fat
Hint that the original code was insufficently understandable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/