[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081104215245.GC17775@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 22:52:45 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...lshack.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, lguest@...abs.org,
jeremy@...source.com, Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> >
> >> And as hpa's comments point it out, compressing the rather stupid
> >> irq stubs might be a third option that looks promising as well.
> >
> > ... and we should try and see how far we can compress those stubs,
> > before we do any segment register based tricks.
> >
>
> Using the techniques previously mentioned, for 224 vectors:
>
> 1792 bytes ( 8 bytes/stub) - trivial.
> 1568 bytes ( 7 bytes/stub) - same without alignment.
> 952 bytes (~4 bytes/stub) - extra jump needed.
>
> For comparison, the IDT itself is 2048 bytes on x86-32 and 4096 bytes on
> x86-64.
sounds like a plan :)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists