[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4910CDF6.1040901@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:34:30 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make NR_IRQS on 32bit is same to 64bit
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 14:10 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> Impact: so NR_IRQS is bigger enough for system with lots of apic/pins
>>
>> Now: if IO_APIC is there, will have big NR_IRQS
>>
>> otherwise still use 224
> [...]
>
> I have no idea whether this is useful, but it doesn't solve the general
> problem that probe_nr_irqs() can return a value > NR_IRQS. So far as I
> can see it can return up to 2 * 24 * MAX_IO_APICS which may be greater
> than NR_VECTORS + (32 * max(MAX_IO_APICS, NR_CPUS)).
your patch is still needed...
also please add one WARN_ON when nr > NR_IRQS.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists