[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811050753120.11867@quilx.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 07:54:39 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, travis@....com
Subject: Re: Git next: Second stage of cpu_alloc patches
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 20:56:52 -0600 (CST) Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>> The second stage of the cpu_alloc patchset can be pulled from
>>
>> kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/christoph/work.git cpu_alloc_stage2
>
> Please send the patches for review. Always.
Well okay can we define a process how to get patches merged with the -next
tree involved? It was nice when you handled all of this but the last
version of the cpu_alloc was thrown out of mm because of a -next conflict
and so it seemed better to go to the source than risk this again.
> I've forgotten how this whole cpu_alloc thing worked and now it's all
> stuffed away in some git tree somewhere. Oh well, whee...
Ok so post a patchset to lkml and at the same time offer a git tree?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists