linux-kernel - Re: PATCH: __bprm_mm_init(): remove uneeded goto

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081104184854.72044220@infradead.org>
Date:	Tue, 4 Nov 2008 18:48:54 -0800
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <lcapitulino@...driva.com.br>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: __bprm_mm_init(): remove uneeded goto

On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:47:03 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> We used to do this trick a *lot* in the kernel (back in the 2.2 days?)
> for this performance reason.  Nowdays gcc is a lot more complex and we
> hope that it can sometimes work these things out for itself and we
> hope that `unlikely' might cause the compiler to move the unlikely
> code out of line.  But I don't know how successful the compiler is at
> doing this, and it'll be dependent upon the gcc version, the wind
> direction, etc.
> 

as far as I know, gcc tends to consider NULL pointer checks as unlikely
by default.

(but we can always tell it so if we think we know better..)

-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/