linux-kernel - Re: time for TCP ECN defaulting to on?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20081104.232920.150683916.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:29:20 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	mchan@...adcom.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...eteddy.net, daniel.blueman@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-net@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: time for TCP ECN defaulting to on?

From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@...adcom.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 22:31:00 -0800

> Assuming ECE and CWR are set infrequently on TSO frames, we still
> benefit from hardware TSO most of the time.  Why is it the wrong
> thing to do?

I had forgotten about that aspect, and yes this is a
good tradeoff considering that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/