lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440811052328l350698caxfc12290a75e613cc@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 5 Nov 2008 23:28:21 -0800
From:	"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Ben Hutchings" <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make NR_IRQS on 32bit is same to 64bit

On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:03 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:52 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Clean-up sidenote: i think we can now remove the VISWS #ifdef portion
>>>>>> for good? Mind sending a patch for that too?
>>>>>
>>>>> could remove CONFIG_PARAVIRT too.. Jeremy?
>>>>>
>>>> This seems like a bad idea, especially for the embedded guys.
>>>
>>> make one CONFIG_NR_IRQS for them before working out one dyna_array is
>>> get merged?
>>>
>>
>> Ah, sorry... I missed the context and thought you meant removing
>> CONFIG_PARAVIRT in general.
>
> I mean make NR_IRQS bigger like IO_APIC is set when CONFIG_PARAVIRT is set.
>
like

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
index 503aadc..0005adb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
@@ -101,18 +101,18 @@
 #define LAST_VM86_IRQ          15
 #define invalid_vm86_irq(irq)  ((irq) < 3 || (irq) > 15)

-#if defined(CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC) && !defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT) &&
!defined(CONFIG_X86_VISWS) && !defined(CONFIG_X86_VOYAGER)
+#if defined(CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC) && !defined(CONFIG_X86_VOYAGER)
 # if NR_CPUS < MAX_IO_APICS
 #  define NR_IRQS (NR_VECTORS + (32 * NR_CPUS))
 # else
 #  define NR_IRQS (NR_VECTORS + (32 * MAX_IO_APICS))
 # endif

-#elif defined(CONFIG_PARAVIRT) || defined(CONFIG_X86_VISWS) ||
defined(CONFIG_X86_VOYAGER)
+#elif defined(CONFIG_X86_VOYAGER)

 # define NR_IRQS               224

-#else /* IO_APIC || PARAVIRT */
+#else /* IO_APIC || VOYAGER */

 # define NR_IRQS               16
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ