[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081106075754.GE8459@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 08:57:54 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: sys_sched_yield keeps locked irq before call of schedule()
* Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@...il.com> wrote:
> > is this some special warning you added? The stock kernel certainly
> > does not emit this warning.
>
> Yes - it's my personal debug checker that tries to watch wether irq
> & irqsafe are running in pair. So it shows a warning if there is a
> call of spin_lock_irq and irq is already dissabled.
btw., i have added lockdep instrumentation for this two years ago,
it's in the upstream kernel:
/proc/lockdep_stats: redundant hardirq ons: 7744
/proc/lockdep_stats: redundant hardirq offs: 1873736
/proc/lockdep_stats: redundant softirq ons: 0
/proc/lockdep_stats: redundant softirq offs: 0
you could extend the code to trace it. See
kernel/lockdep.c:trace_hardirqs_on_caller(). This bit does it:
if (unlikely(curr->hardirqs_enabled)) {
debug_atomic_inc(&redundant_hardirqs_on);
return;
}
you could add a ftrace_printk("redundant hardirq") call right there,
enable ftrace, and enable stack tracing of each trace entry:
echo stacktrace > /debug/tracing/iter_ctrl
then you should see all the call sites in /debug/tracing/trace.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists