[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811060900450.3595@quilx.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:03:10 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@...gle.com>,
Doug Chapman <doug.chapman@...com>, mingo@...e.hu,
roland@...hat.com, adobriyan@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: regression introduced by - timers: fix itimer/many thread hang
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Also, you just introduced per-cpu allocations for each thread-group,
> while Christoph is reworking the per-cpu allocator, with one unfortunate
> side-effect - its going to have a limited size pool. Therefore this will
> limit the number of thread-groups we can have.
Patches exist that implement a dynamically growable percpu pool (using
virtual mappings though). If the cost of the additional complexity /
overhead is justifiable then we can make the percpu pool dynamically
extendable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists