[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1225991487.7803.4801.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:11:27 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@...inux.co.jp>,
Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@...inux.co.jp>,
Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@...il.com>,
Satoshi UCHIDA <s-uchida@...jp.nec.com>,
fernando@....ntt.co.jp, balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, menage@...gle.com,
ngupta@...gle.com, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] [RFC] Another proportional weight IO controller
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 11:57 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > The only real issue I can see is with linear volumes, but those are
> > stupid anyway - non of the gains but all the risks.
>
> Linear volumes may well be the most common ones.
>
> People start out with the filesystems at a certain size,
> increasing onto a second (new) disk later, when more space
> is required.
Are they aware of how risky linear volumes are? I would discourage
anyone from using them.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists