[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <y0mej1ofvyz.fsf@ton.toronto.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:19:48 -0500
From: fche@...hat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, alan@...hat.com,
jbaron@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: add an fsync tracer
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> writes:
> [...]
> what is the real need is
> 1) Have a trace point in the source
> 2) Associate a "formatting function" with that point
> (which basically transforms the trace parameters to, say, a string)
> 3) A way to turn the trace point on/off.
For 1 and 2, it may be worth considering a plain trace_mark() in
do_sync(). The complication that makes this uglier than a one-liner
is d_path()'s buffer and error handling.
{
char *buffer = kzalloc (4096, GFP_KERNEL);
trace_mark(fsync, "Process %s is calling fsync on %s\n",
current->comm,
({char *err = d_path (...);
IS_ERR(err) ? "?" : err;}));
kfree (buffer);
}
With a bit of extension on the marker front, the allocation could be
made conditional on the marker being enabled.
For 3, the kernel could merge a backend that connects arbitrary
markers to an ftrace (or whatever) buffer. Several compact prototypes
for the latter exist.
- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists