linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] revert: timers: fix itimer/many thread hang

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:53:57 -0600 (CST)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@...gle.com>,
	Doug Chapman <doug.chapman@...com>, roland@...hat.com,
	adobriyan@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] revert: timers: fix itimer/many thread hang

On Thu, 6 Nov 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> That loop could _perhaps_ be avoided by maintaining the sums from the
> scheduler tick: by just adding the latest delta values for the current
> task to times->*time. Plus at exit time cleaning up the remaining
> delta. That would be a far smaller patch.

That is a similar scheme to the ZVC (see mm/vmstat.c). Peter: Dont you
have an implementation of a ZVC like scheme for you dirty throttling
patchset that may be useful here?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/