[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49137255.9010104@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:40:21 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, H L <swdevyid@...oo.com>,
Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@...el.com>, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
grundler@...isc-linux.org, achiang@...com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, rdreier@...co.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/16 v6] PCI: Linux kernel SR-IOV support
Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 10:47:41AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
>> I don't think we really know what the One True Usage model is for VF
>> devices. Chris Wright has some ideas, I have some ideas and Yu Zhao has
>> some ideas. I bet there's other people who have other ideas too.
>>
>
> I'd love to hear those ideas.
>
We've been talking about avoiding hardware passthrough entirely and just
backing a virtio-net backend driver by a dedicated VF in the host. That
avoids a huge amount of guest-facing complexity, let's migration Just
Work, and should give the same level of performance.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> Rumor has it, there is some Xen code floating around to support this
> already, is that true?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists