[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081107061700.GD3860@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 22:17:00 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, H L <swdevyid@...oo.com>,
Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@...el.com>, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
grundler@...isc-linux.org, achiang@...com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, rdreier@...co.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/16 v6] PCI: Linux kernel SR-IOV support
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 04:40:21PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 10:47:41AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>
>>> I don't think we really know what the One True Usage model is for VF
>>> devices. Chris Wright has some ideas, I have some ideas and Yu Zhao has
>>> some ideas. I bet there's other people who have other ideas too.
>>>
>>
>> I'd love to hear those ideas.
>>
>
> We've been talking about avoiding hardware passthrough entirely and
> just backing a virtio-net backend driver by a dedicated VF in the
> host. That avoids a huge amount of guest-facing complexity, let's
> migration Just Work, and should give the same level of performance.
Does that involve this patch set? Or a different type of interface.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists