[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081107004131.GD2373@disturbed>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 11:41:31 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@...inux.co.jp>,
Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@...inux.co.jp>,
Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@...il.com>,
Satoshi UCHIDA <s-uchida@...jp.nec.com>,
fernando@....ntt.co.jp, balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, menage@...gle.com,
ngupta@...gle.com, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] [RFC] Another proportional weight IO controller
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 06:11:27PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 11:57 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > > The only real issue I can see is with linear volumes, but those are
> > > stupid anyway - non of the gains but all the risks.
> >
> > Linear volumes may well be the most common ones.
> >
> > People start out with the filesystems at a certain size,
> > increasing onto a second (new) disk later, when more space
> > is required.
>
> Are they aware of how risky linear volumes are? I would discourage
> anyone from using them.
In what way are they risky?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists