linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpumask: introduce new API, without changing anything

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20081107201139.196fa52b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 7 Nov 2008 20:11:39 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpumask: introduce new API, without changing anything

Hi Ingo,

On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 09:40:16 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> if this is equal to the patch that you sent me (see the git 
> coordinates below), it was also stess-tested and build-coverage tested 
> by me on a healthy range of x86 systems, in a range of build 
> environments.

It isn't identical.  See my message about a small merge conflict between
the cpus4096 tree and the rr tree in linux-next today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped