[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081107165238.GA23055@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:52:38 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: adobriyan@...il.com, Doug Chapman <doug.chapman@...com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] account_group_exec_runtime: fix the racy usage of ->signal
Compile tested.
Unlike other similar routines, account_group_exec_runtime() could be
called "implicitly" after exit_notify(). This means we can race with
the parent doing release_task(), we can't just check ->signal != NULL.
Take ->siglock to make sure ->signal can't go away.
This is the minimal fix, with this patch we don't need need get/put cpu,
and I think we should uninline this function.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
--- K-28/kernel/sched_stats.h~A_G_E_R_FIX 2008-11-07 17:32:02.000000000 +0100
+++ K-28/kernel/sched_stats.h 2008-11-07 17:44:39.000000000 +0100
@@ -351,10 +351,12 @@ static inline void account_group_exec_ru
unsigned long long ns)
{
struct signal_struct *sig;
+ unsigned long flags;
- sig = tsk->signal;
- if (unlikely(!sig))
+ if (unlikely(!lock_task_sighand(tsk, &flags)))
return;
+
+ sig = tsk->signal;
if (sig->cputime.totals) {
struct task_cputime *times;
@@ -362,4 +364,6 @@ static inline void account_group_exec_ru
times->sum_exec_runtime += ns;
put_cpu_no_resched();
}
+
+ unlock_task_sighand(tsk, &flags);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists