[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081107104519.2caa959f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:45:19 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, dhowells@...hat.com, nico@....org,
mingo@...e.hu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, davem@...emloft.net,
mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 08/18] cnt32_to_63 should use smp_rmb()
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:36:27 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Referring to include/linux/tracepoint.h:DEFINE_TRACE()?
> >
> > It does look a bit fragile. Does every .c file which included
> > include/trace/block.h get a copy of __tracepoint_block_rq_issue,
> > whether or not it used that tracepoint? Hopefully not.
>
> Look at "ratelimit()" too. Broken, broken.
Yup. Easy enough to fix, but...
> Of course, I don't think it's
> actually _used_ anywhere, so..
>
removing it altogether would be best, I think. It's a bit of an odd
thing.
I'll see what this
--- a/include/linux/ratelimit.h~a
+++ a/include/linux/ratelimit.h
@@ -17,11 +17,4 @@ struct ratelimit_state {
struct ratelimit_state name = {interval, burst,}
extern int __ratelimit(struct ratelimit_state *rs);
-
-static inline int ratelimit(void)
-{
- static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
- DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
- return __ratelimit(&rs);
-}
#endif
breaks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists