[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200811071317.19159.rob@landley.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 13:17:17 -0600
From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
mtk.manpages@...il.com, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC] Documentation tree sub-directories reorg.
On Tuesday 04 November 2008 17:23:45 Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:50:36 -0800
>
> Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net> wrote:
> > I would like to use a few more sub-directories in the Documentation/
> > tree to try to help clean it up some. E.g., move some drivers/block/
> > doc files to Documentation/blockdev/ and move some serial/tty/chardev
> > doc files to Documentation/serial/
>
> This all makes fine sense to me, but I do wonder if we shouldn't also
> create an "obsolete" subdirectory and put some of those files there?
> For example, paride.txt starts off this way:
>
> Owing to the simplicity and near universality of the parallel port
> interface to personal computers, many external devices such as
> portable hard-disk, CD-ROM, LS-120 and tape drives use the parallel
> port to connect to their host computer.
>
> Said ports are not quite as universal as they once were.
Yeah, but the robotics guys guys love 'em as a really easy way to get
controllable pinouts from PC hardware. :)
No objection to the idea of a place to put obsolete docs,
although "deprecated" might be a better name and it seems like it relates to
feature-removal-schedule.txt somehow...
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists