[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081107015844.GA11884@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 17:58:44 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: H L <swdevyid@...oo.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yu.zhao@...el.com>, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
grundler@...isc-linux.org, achiang@...com, matthew@....cx,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, rdreier@...co.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, Xen-devel List <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: git repository for SR-IOV development?
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 11:58:25AM -0800, H L wrote:
> --- On Thu, 11/6/08, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 08:51:09AM -0800, H L wrote:
> > >
> > > Has anyone initiated or given consideration to the
> > creation of a git
> > > repository (say, on kernel.org) for SR-IOV
> > development?
> >
> > Why? It's only a few patches, right? Why would it
> > need a whole new git
> > tree?
>
>
> So as to minimize the time and effort patching a kernel, especially if
> the tree (and/or hash level) against which the patches were created
> fails to be specified on a mailing-list. Plus, there appears to be
> questions raised on how, precisely, the implementation should
> ultimately be modeled and especially given that, who knows at this
> point what number of patches will ultimately be submitted? I know
> I've built the "7-patch" one (painfully, by the way), and I'm aware
> there's another 15-patch set out there which I've not yet examined.
It's a mere 7 or 15 patches, you don't need a whole git tree for
something small like that.
Especially as there only seems to be one developer doing real work...
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists