| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 14:13:53 -0800 From: "Yinghai Lu" <yinghai@...nel.org> To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: "Kumar Gala" <galak@...nel.crashing.org>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] irq: Maintain user set affinity On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:31:05 -0600 (CST) > Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org> wrote: > >> >From 819ad3ed4660f4238e053728a8b5aa93d22b13d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org> >> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 10:13:53 -0600 >> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] irq: Maintain user set affinity >> >> This addresses a regression in that if a user specified an affinity >> for an interrupt that affinity information would get reset between >> a request_irq(), free_irq() and request_irq() for the same irq. >> ... > > Are you able to identify when this regression occurred? It isn't > immediately obvious to me. > > If the regression is present in 2.6.27 or earlier, do you think we > should backport the fix? If so, a different patch would be needed due > to the presence of it seems that is not a regression... YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists