[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081107184629.97eb5ec3.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 18:46:29 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, maneesh@...ibm.com,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srinivasa Ds <srinivasa@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobe: increase kprobe_hash_table size
On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:33:49 -0500 Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com> wrote:
> Not really. Hmm, I have to investigate more on this problem.
OK ;)
Meanwhile, how does this look?
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
We only need the cacheline padding on SMP kernels. Saves 6k:
text data bss dec hex filename
5713 388 2632 8733 221d kernel/kprobes.o
5713 388 8840 14941 3a5d kernel/kprobes.o
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
---
kernel/kprobes.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -puN kernel/kprobes.c~a kernel/kprobes.c
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c~a
+++ a/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static bool kprobe_enabled;
DEFINE_MUTEX(kprobe_mutex); /* Protects kprobe_table */
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, kprobe_instance) = NULL;
static struct {
- spinlock_t lock ____cacheline_aligned;
+ spinlock_t lock ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
} kretprobe_table_locks[KPROBE_TABLE_SIZE];
static spinlock_t *kretprobe_table_lock_ptr(unsigned long hash)
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists