[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081109122515.1deb9ec2@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 12:25:15 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org>,
JosephChan@....com.tw, <linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix crash in viafb due to 4k stack overflow
On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:36:03 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 20:25:37 +0100 Bruno Pr__mont
> <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org> wrote:
>
> > The function viafb_cursor() uses 2 stack-variables of CURSOR_SIZE
> > bits; CURSOR_SIZE is defined as (8 * 1024). Using up twice 1k on
> > stack is too much for 4k-stack (though it works with 8k-stacks).
>
> >
> > if (viacursor.enable)
>
> Is the ->fb_cursor handler allowed to perform GFP_KERNEL memory
> allocations? It's never called from atomic contexts?
if it's allowed to do GFP_KERNEL memory allocations the statement that
it works with 8k stacks is a bit overstated... since irq's can come in
and take several KB of stack as well ;)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists