[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081109075021.GB12238@localhost>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 10:50:22 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq
[Yinghai Lu - Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 11:05:55PM -0800]
|
| impact: new feature sparseirq
|
| for sparse_irq, irq_desc, and irq_cfg is not using list_head to chain up
| also not add per_cpu_dyn_array... no user now
|
| add some kind of hash table as Ingo suggesting.
| remove dyna_array, and enable sparse_irq by default, use kzalloc_node to get it
| use desc->chip_data for x86 to store irq_cfg
| make irq_desc to go with affinity aka irq_desc moving etc
| only call move_irq_desc in irq_complete_move() --- but it seems not trigger that moving.
|
| Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
|
| ---
Hi Yinghai,
from a glance view (didn't read the whole patch)
...
|
| -static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg_alloc(unsigned int irq)
| +static struct irq_cfg *get_one_free_irq_cfg(int cpu)
| {
| - return irq_cfg(irq);
| + struct irq_cfg *cfg;
| + int node;
| +
| + if (cpu < 0)
| + cpu = smp_processor_id();
| + node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
| +
| + cfg = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*cfg), GFP_KERNEL, node);
| + printk(KERN_DEBUG " alloc irq_cfg on cpu %d node %d\n", cpu, node);
| +
| + return cfg;
| }
|
| -/*
| - * Rough estimation of how many shared IRQs there are, can be changed
| - * anytime.
| - */
| -#define MAX_PLUS_SHARED_IRQS NR_IRQS
| -#define PIN_MAP_SIZE (MAX_PLUS_SHARED_IRQS + NR_IRQS)
| +static void free_irq_cfg(struct irq_cfg *cfg)
| +{
| + kfree(cfg);
| +}
| +
| +void arch_init_chip_data(struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu)
| +{
| + struct irq_cfg *cfg;
| +
| + cfg = desc->chip_data;
| + if (!cfg)
| + desc->chip_data = get_one_free_irq_cfg(cpu);
| +}
| +
| +static void init_copy_irq_2_pin(struct irq_cfg *old_cfg, struct irq_cfg *cfg,
| + int cpu);
| +
| +void arch_init_copy_chip_data(struct irq_desc *old_desc,
| + struct irq_desc *desc, int cpu)
| +{
| + struct irq_cfg *cfg;
| + struct irq_cfg *old_cfg;
| +
| + cfg = get_one_free_irq_cfg(cpu);
| + desc->chip_data = cfg;
| +
| + old_cfg = old_desc->chip_data;
| +
| + memcpy(cfg, old_cfg, sizeof(struct irq_cfg));
If cfg gets NULL here we will be NULL-dereferring
(cause of possible kzalloc_node fails).
| +
| + init_copy_irq_2_pin(old_cfg, cfg, cpu);
| +}
| +
...
Am I missgin something?
- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists