linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix __pfn_to_page(pfn) for CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081109113736.GE6094@elf.ucw.cz>
Date:	Sun, 9 Nov 2008 12:37:36 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix __pfn_to_page(pfn) for CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM=y

On Sat 2008-11-08 21:54:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Nov 2008 14:12:21 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> 
> > On Saturday, 8 of November 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > > This would be good to have in .28 IMO.
> > > 
> > > Actually, this makes sense even for .27-stable, AFAICT.
> > 
> > Yes, it does, but it has to be merged first. :-)
> 
> It applies to 2.6.26 (at least).  Is there no need for it in kernels
> earlier than 2.6.27.x?

It would be nice to fix it there, too. (OTOH that config never worked
and we did not see huge pile of complains, so I guess the world would
not fall down if it was not in 2.6.26...)
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/