linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Nov 2008 01:55:11 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq

On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:40:33 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:

> > >> @@ -987,6 +988,8 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
> > >>
> > >>       set_highmem_pages_init();
> > >>
> > >> +     after_bootmem = 1;
> > >
> > > this hack can go away once we have a proper percpu_alloc() that can be
> > > used early enough.
> > 
> > where is that fancy patch? current percpu_alloc(), will keep big 
> > pointer in array..., instead of put that pointer in percpu_area
> > 
> > 64bit has that after_bootmem already.
> 
> or at least introduce a "bootmem agnostic" allocator instead of 
> open-coding the after_bootmem flag.
> 
> Something like:
> 
>   early_kzalloc()
> 
> ?
> 
> Andrew, any preferences?

My mind reading ain't what it was, and this after_bootmem flag is
write-only in this patch.

So what's all this about?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/