[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4918065A.6050402@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 02:00:58 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sparse_irq aka dyn_irq
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:40:33 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
>>>>> @@ -987,6 +988,8 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
>>>>>
>>>>> set_highmem_pages_init();
>>>>>
>>>>> + after_bootmem = 1;
>>>> this hack can go away once we have a proper percpu_alloc() that can be
>>>> used early enough.
>>> where is that fancy patch? current percpu_alloc(), will keep big
>>> pointer in array..., instead of put that pointer in percpu_area
>>>
>>> 64bit has that after_bootmem already.
>> or at least introduce a "bootmem agnostic" allocator instead of
>> open-coding the after_bootmem flag.
>>
>> Something like:
>>
>> early_kzalloc()
>>
>> ?
>>
>> Andrew, any preferences?
>
> My mind reading ain't what it was, and this after_bootmem flag is
> write-only in this patch.
>
> So what's all this about?
if i use alloc_bootmem to get some memory, and later after_bootmem, can I use kfree to free it?
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists