[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87hc6fpwof.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 13:55:44 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_NUMA breaks hibernation on x86-32 with PAE
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> writes:
>
> No good ideas - the bug description gives me the impression of memory
> maps save/restore hickup in the hibernation code - and memory maps are
> pretty much the only thing that are significantly different on NUMA.
I assume the problem happened on a single node system.
On single node the memory map should be actually quite similar
to the UMA case.
One possibility would be to bisect if it ever worked?
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists