[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081110151733.GB16520@logfs.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:17:33 +0100
From: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
open-osd development <osd-dev@...n-osd.org>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, Sami.Iren@...gate.com,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/18 ver2] libosd: OSDv1 Headers
On Mon, 10 November 2008 10:47:07 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>
> If the assembly - size and offsets - of foo is exactly the same with or
> without the __packed, but the generated code is different then clearly this
> is a compiler bug. I've herd of this myth before, and at least with my
> gcc 4.1.2 there is no such bug. Either the structure gets packed, or there is
> no difference. All the places I have __packed in the code are absolutely must
> be so, stated by the protocol.
Ok, if current compilers are fine, I won't complain.
Jörn
--
There's nothing better for promoting creativity in a medium than
making an audience feel "Hmm I could do better than that!"
-- Douglas Adams in a slashdot interview
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists