linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] oprofile: re-arm APIC_DM_NMI in ppro_check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49185F08.9030705@cosmosbay.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:19:20 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
CC:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oprofile: re-arm APIC_DM_NMI in ppro_check_ctrs()

Cyrill Gorcunov a écrit :
> [Eric Dumazet - Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 03:23:00PM +0100]
>> Andi Kleen a écrit :
>>> Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
>>>> index 3f1b81a..716d26f 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
>>>> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static void ppro_setup_ctrs(struct op_msrs const * const msrs)
>>>>  	int i;
>>>>   	if (!reset_value) {
>>>> -		reset_value = kmalloc(sizeof(unsigned) * num_counters,
>>>> +		reset_value = kmalloc(sizeof(reset_value[0]) * num_counters,
>>> Thanks for tracking this down.
>>>
>>> But that still doesn't explain why 2.6.27 fails too?
>> Desesperatly Seeking Oprofile, next round.
>>
>> I know *nothing* about APIC but spent few hours to try several tricks
>> and finally found something.
>>
>> It solved my problem : oprofile can run several hours without
>> any freeze of NMI on any core.
>>
>> # grep NMI /proc/interrupts
>> NMI:   10902884    9635871   10333815    8372989    7971483    8298373    8877495   10206963   Non-maskable interrupts
>> ...
>> # grep NMI /proc/interrupts
>> NMI:   15518834   14340713   15038694   13078235   12676585   13003394   13582115   14912146   Non-maskable interrupts
>>
>>
>> Can anybody understand and explain what is happening ?
>>
>> Is it a software or hardware problem ?
>>
>> [PATCH] oprofile: re-arm APIC_DM_NMI in ppro_check_ctrs()
>>
>> While using oprofile on my HP BL460c G1, (two quad core intel E5450 CPU),
>> I noticed that one CPU after the other could not get anymore NMI.
>>
>> After a while, all cores where blocked (ie not generating events for oprofile)
>> I tried all major linux versions and all where affected by this freeze.
>>
>> I found that we have to re-arm APIC_DM_NMI *before* writing to MSR counter
>> when we get event notification.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
>> arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c |    8 +++++---
>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> | diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
> | index 3f1b81a..7b142da 100644
> | --- a/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
> | +++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/op_model_ppro.c
> | @@ -132,13 +132,15 @@ static int ppro_check_ctrs(struct pt_regs * const regs,
> |  		rdmsrl(msrs->counters[i].addr, val);
> |  		if (CTR_OVERFLOWED(val)) {
> |  			oprofile_add_sample(regs, i);
> | +			/*
> | +			 * We need to unmask the apic vector *before*
> | +			 * writing reset_value to msr counter
> | +			 */
> | +			apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI);
> |  			wrmsrl(msrs->counters[i].addr, -reset_value[i]);
> |  		}
> |  	}
> |  
> | -	/* Only P6 based Pentium M need to re-unmask the apic vector but it
> | -	 * doesn't hurt other P6 variant */
> | -	apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, apic_read(APIC_LVTPC) & ~APIC_LVT_MASKED);
> |  
> |  	/* We can't work out if we really handled an interrupt. We
> |  	 * might have caught a *second* counter just after overflowing
> 
> Hi Eric,
> 
> for the record
> 
> 	apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI);
> 
> is not just 'unmask' but also *zeroify* (not sure if I wrote this
> word right :) all fields when the origianl code was just 'unmasking'
> TPC register
> 
> 	apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, apic_read(APIC_LVTPC) & ~APIC_LVT_MASKED);
> 
> that is why apic_read() was in former.
> 

Well, given that APIC_LVTPC is initialized by oprofile init to value APIC_DM_NMI,
I avoid an apic_read() and just write APIC_DM_NMI again...

Presumably, apic_read(APIC_LVTPC) should return APIC_DM_NMI or APIC_DM_NMI|APIC_LVT_MASKED

Thanks

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/